LabelGMOs

Contact

Please visit our FAQ page to see if your question has already been answered first. 

If you have a suggestion to improve the website, please post that here. For all other inquiries please fill out the form below.

Where are you located? Comments?


Showing 587 reactions

  • commented 2015-02-23 17:37:05 -0800
    Hi. We are a non-GMO soybean and sunflower oil producer. Can you help us?


    Healthy Harvest Productions is a Colorado family owned business committed to the production of non-GMO food products. We believe that our value proposition and product offerings align well with non-GMO groups and health food markets.


    Currently, we produce a Non-GMO Soybean cooking oil, an Organic Soybean Oil, and a Non-GMO Sunflower Oil.


    Our products are very unique not only in the aspect that they are non-GMO, but also because we incorporate a completely natural process from the crushing all the way through refinement of the oil. Our mechanical expeller process physically crushes the beans using NO chemicals or harmful additives that are typical to the industry. The refinement process that we use is a century old artisanal kettle batch refinement process that physically refines the oil. This allows the oil to retain a significantly higher level of natural antioxidants and Omega-3’s to form a unique product that has very beneficial cooking properties!!


    Additional benefits derived from this refinement method include a lower consumption rate than that of standard fry oil. For example, standard fry oil used to fry 50 lbs. of frozen French fries would consume 4 lbs. of oil. HHP Oil would only consume 2 lbs. of oil. Multiply that by 8 hours a day!


    These same properties of our oil also give it two to three times the fry life. For example, one preliminary test cooking fried chicken and measuring with a standard hot fry oil tester showed our oil was still good even after THREE TIMES then standard amount of chicken!


    We have had tremendous response to our products from restaurants, commercial kitchens, and consumers alike. We are in discussions with many non-GMO organizations, purchase groups and commercial food processors.


    Our Oils are available in tankers, totes, 55-gal drums, JIBs, and 1 liter and ½ liter retail bottles.


    We are excited about our new web site and would like to invite you to check it out:

    www.healthyharvestnongmo.com


    We have detailed flyers if you have an interest and would be happy to discuss this wonderful opportunity
  • commented 2015-02-06 08:58:28 -0800
    February 4, 2015

    LabelGMOs.org


    Dear LabelGMOs.org,


    Did you know that GMOs could cause numerous health issues? Did you also know that if you eat too many GMOs, you could possibly die. They also harm our environment. GMOs are genetically modified organisms that can be found in your food. People make them by cross spreading foods DNAs to make them a new type of food. I think that the most important aspect of the “food system” for consumers to be concerned about are GMOs because they can cause health issues, they can create superbugs, and they harm the environment.

    GMOs can cause many health issues. For instance, they can cause many types of cancer and also illnesses. According to an article titled 10 reasons to avoid GMOs, “Numerous health problems increased after GMOs were introduced in 1996.” (http://www.responsibletechnology.org/10-Reasons-to-Avoid-GMOs) This proves that when GMOs were invented, people didn’t realize what they were eating and started to get sick. This also proves that GMOs are unhealthy for our bodies therefore people should stop creating them. It is possible to die if you eat too many GMOs.

    10 Problems Genetically Modified Foods Are Already Causing states that GMOs can create superbugs. Superbugs are bugs that survive the chemicals and toxins sprayed on the foods. According to the article, 10 Problems Genetically Modified Foods Are Already Causing, “The good thing about designing a plant with an insecticide gene is it eliminates a lot of unwanted bugs. The downside is that only the strongest insects survive, resulting in a new class of superbugs resistant to both the crops’ implanted toxins and spray-on chemicals.” (http://listverse.com/2013/06/22/10-problems-genetically-modified-foods-are-already-causing/) So, that means that the chemicals are sprayed on the foods. The chemicals kill off the small unwanted bugs but the stronger bugs that are worse survive the chemicals and stay on the crops. Also, the methods GMO companies use to pest proof their crops kills bees and butterflies.


    As stated above, GMO chemicals harm the environment. The environmental impact of GMOs states that the chemicals used to make GMOs kill bees and butterflies. As seen in the article, “Bees are hugely important in the pollination of many food crops, but are unfortunately extremely endangered by modern agricultural techniques, such as GM crops. Monarch butterflies are specifically at risk from GMO maize plants.” (http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/the-environmental-impact-of-gmos/) So this means that the agriculture techniques are dangerous to both the Monarch butterfly and the bees.


    GMOs have now changed the way we look at our household food. They are a big problem to our Earth. GMOs affect our health and our environment. Most people don’t even know what they are putting in their own mouths. Since GMOs can cause cancer they should be illegal. I am now concerned to what others and I have been eating.


    Sincerely,


    Lauren

    Language Arts, 6th grade

    Redwood Middle School

    3600 Oxford Street

    (707) 253-3411

    Katherine_vantreese@nvusd.org
  • commented 2015-02-06 08:58:27 -0800
    February 4, 2015

    LabelGMOs.org


    Dear LabelGMOs.org,


    Did you know that GMOs could cause numerous health issues? Did you also know that if you eat too many GMOs, you could possibly die. They also harm our environment. GMOs are genetically modified organisms that can be found in your food. People make them by cross spreading foods DNAs to make them a new type of food. I think that the most important aspect of the “food system” for consumers to be concerned about are GMOs because they can cause health issues, they can create superbugs, and they harm the environment.

    GMOs can cause many health issues. For instance, they can cause many types of cancer and also illnesses. According to an article titled 10 reasons to avoid GMOs, “Numerous health problems increased after GMOs were introduced in 1996.” (http://www.responsibletechnology.org/10-Reasons-to-Avoid-GMOs) This proves that when GMOs were invented, people didn’t realize what they were eating and started to get sick. This also proves that GMOs are unhealthy for our bodies therefore people should stop creating them. It is possible to die if you eat too many GMOs.

    10 Problems Genetically Modified Foods Are Already Causing states that GMOs can create superbugs. Superbugs are bugs that survive the chemicals and toxins sprayed on the foods. According to the article, 10 Problems Genetically Modified Foods Are Already Causing, “The good thing about designing a plant with an insecticide gene is it eliminates a lot of unwanted bugs. The downside is that only the strongest insects survive, resulting in a new class of superbugs resistant to both the crops’ implanted toxins and spray-on chemicals.” (http://listverse.com/2013/06/22/10-problems-genetically-modified-foods-are-already-causing/) So, that means that the chemicals are sprayed on the foods. The chemicals kill off the small unwanted bugs but the stronger bugs that are worse survive the chemicals and stay on the crops. Also, the methods GMO companies use to pest proof their crops kills bees and butterflies.


    As stated above, GMO chemicals harm the environment. The environmental impact of GMOs states that the chemicals used to make GMOs kill bees and butterflies. As seen in the article, “Bees are hugely important in the pollination of many food crops, but are unfortunately extremely endangered by modern agricultural techniques, such as GM crops. Monarch butterflies are specifically at risk from GMO maize plants.” (http://www.onegreenplanet.org/animalsandnature/the-environmental-impact-of-gmos/) So this means that the agriculture techniques are dangerous to both the Monarch butterfly and the bees.


    GMOs have now changed the way we look at our household food. They are a big problem to our Earth. GMOs affect our health and our environment. Most people don’t even know what they are putting in their own mouths. Since GMOs can cause cancer they should be illegal. I am now concerned to what others and I have been eating.


    Sincerely,


    Lauren

    Language Arts, 6th grade

    Redwood Middle School

    3600 Oxford Street

    (707) 253-3411

    Katherine_vantreese@nvusd.org
  • commented 2015-01-30 16:26:16 -0800
    Santa Rosa , CA

    I am interested in talking with you to see if you would be interested in having a table at a festival I am organizing for Earth Day called Day on the Green at the Village. It takes place in Montgomery Village Shopping Center Open Air) April 25. Here are some highlights of the event. I

    Day on the Green at the Village

    A Premier Earth Day Experience


    JOIN US FOR A DAY OF

    FAMILY FUN AT THE VILLAGE!!


    Saturday April 25, 11 am to 4 pm

    At Village Court, Santa Rosa, CA 95405

    Highlights include:

    • Art show and sale Juried by Retired Congresswoman Lynn Woolsey

    and Executive Producer of Bay Lights Amy Critchett

    • Live music by Shana Morrison and her band Caledonia

    • Green businesses and organizations

    • Dance performances and live art demonstrations

    • Free face painting and other activities for kids of all ages

    • Local beers, wines, beverages that benefit LandPaths

    • Admission is free!

    Please let me know if you are interested. I can send you more information and the Non-Profit paperwork.

    Kathleen McCallum

    Day on the Green Director

    Email: Artrep@sonic.net

    Cell: 707-328-8094
  • @kennyhasatweet tweeted link to this page. 2015-01-23 10:54:40 -0800
  • posted about this on Facebook 2015-01-23 10:54:40 -0800
    Contact
  • commented 2015-01-23 10:54:14 -0800
    I’m doing everything I can to help educate the masses on food education and the detrimental effects of GMOs. I wrote an article breaking down what GMOs are in a very basic, easy-to-read format to help anyone understand GMOs and I just want to share this article with as many people as possible and would love to have it published and/or shared.


    Thanks!


    https://kennyhasapen.wordpress.com/2015/01/12/gm-what-gmo/
  • commented 2015-01-07 06:45:06 -0800
    i am traveling between the Dominican Republic, Oregon and Washington and get into California about every 3 months and have been talking to Latinos in California about GMO’s

    I am setting up some GMO presentations here in the Dominican Republic.
  • commented 2014-12-08 01:44:16 -0800
    Hello,


    I’d like to inquire if it’s possible to purchase adverting space on your website labelgmos.org


    If there is any space available please let me and we could discuss further details.


    Looking forward to your positive reply.
  • commented 2014-12-07 20:48:03 -0800
    Dear owner of labelgmos.org


    I’m sure you have been contacted in this matter many times before but our value proposition is much different. We show the client results before we ask for any further commitment.


    As a business owner you might be interested to gain profit by placing your website among top in search engines.


    Your website needs immediate improvement for some major issues with your website.


    -Low online presence for many competitive keyword phrases


    -Unorganized social media accounts


    -Not compatible with all mobile devices


    -Many bad back links to your website


    I have selected your website and prepared a FREE website audit report.  This is for you, completely free at no charge.


    If my proposal sound’s interesting for your business goal, feel free to email me, or can provide me with your phone number and the best time to call you. I am also available for an online meeting to present you this website audit report.


    I look forward to hearing from you – thanks!


    Best Regards,

    Donald Kevin

    Marketing Consultant


    PS: I am not spamming. I have studied your website, prepared an audit report and believe I can help with your business promotion. If you still want us to not contact you, you can ignore this email or ask to remove and I will not contact again.
  • commented 2014-12-03 17:57:16 -0800
    If we don’t have Facebook or Twitter, how do we log in to Fast Action?
  • commented 2014-12-01 11:10:00 -0800
    HI, My name is Jody Shepard, I live in Antioch, California, but have lived all over the USA.. I just had the pleasure of reading a study in the toxicology report in the Mother earth magizine.. I have had almost every one of these health issues for the past 10 years, but severely over the past 4 years.. My pancreas has stopped processing, I take Zen pep (5-6 a day) my EPO levels are low without reason and my red blood cells multiply, I have had ten phlebotomies in the past 2 years to control, they say i have erythromytosis not polycethemia vera, because of a bone marrow biopsy ,I spent 14 days in the hospital with a small bowel obstruction which was actually a leaky gut, I have been given a crohns diagnosis, & I have skin rashes and migraines.. I have blamed it on being poisoned for years but I didn’t know the connection, I blamed mainly tomato, potato & yeast products… It took food journaling for months to figure out anything from a box or processed food was responsible..what can I do to help you,?? I want to stop this poison from hurting our future generations..I have years of documented doctors and hospital visits including UCSF for stomach issues, & skin issues.. I think there has to be a way to start a class action suite, or at least get warnings on foods like on cigarettes, warning people of these chemicals.. my cell number is 6782967348 if I can do anything at all.. I felt I really needed to reach out to you.. Thank you for your time, Jody Shepard
  • commented 2014-11-22 19:52:34 -0800
    My name is Cam, I’m the founder of a social-enterprise AgTech startup in Vermont that makes growing your own 100% organic non-GMO food as easy making your bed. We just launched on Kickstarter and need the support of like-minded people for us to achieve our funding goal and bring the benefits of nutritious and delicious food to everyone!


    https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/86203544/the-seedsheet-the-future-of-fresh
  • commented 2014-11-18 13:14:07 -0800
    To whom it may concern,


    I am a student at the University of New Hampshire and I am writing a research paper relating to the usage of GMOs and what implications this has on the environment and humans. I was wondering if I could get in contact with a representative from Hawai’i SEED to conduct an interview for my paper. It would be much appreciated and I look forward to hearing back from you.


    Jon Kiskinis

    jmh347@wildcats.unh.edu

    978-846-5501
  • commented 2014-11-12 00:17:55 -0800
    Hey there, we just teamed up with CustomMade to create this article on the Decline of the Bee Population and I thought your readers might enjoy it:

    http://www.custommade.com/blog/beyond-the-bees-knees/


    If you want to share, please just link back to the source and let me know when your post is live so I can send visitors your way as a thanks.


    Aldo Baker
  • commented 2014-10-31 12:42:21 -0700
    Need to speak with someone about an injunction being filed to stop the harvest of Gene maize this week.and placing a GMO moratorium on GMOs in monterey County.
  • commented 2014-10-31 11:47:19 -0700
    Hi Coleen, thank you for your great work on trying to stop GMOs. i spearheaded the GMO moratorium four years ago. I live inMonterey. Help me stop Gene Maize from being harvested in Monterey County this week. We need an injunction/ Please call if interested


    Thanks, lornaas I hardly get to computers. Thanks. Lorna Moffat
  • commented 2014-10-29 12:34:25 -0700
    FRED!! Wake UP!!


    We are working on climate chaos by working on GMO labeling. According to the UN (and others), Industrial Ag contributes over 50% of greenhouse gasses. It also kills microbes that sequester more carbon than rain forests. Changing our ag system not only will slow down climate chaos, it will reverse it. We have a right to know what kind of food system our purchases are supporting. Clear labels provide us with transparency and true choice.


    http://unctad.org/en/publicationslibrary/ditcted2012d3_en.pdf


    64 countries label and NONE had an increase in food prices. You are being lied to.


    What stores do you shop in? NOT true about labels already.


    Labelgmos.org is a volunteer organization. The only person who gets any reimbursement is the web designer…and they work at a greatly reduced fee. I’ve volunteered 40-100 hours a week since January 2011. So much for that chance at spreading negativity.


    We have talked with former paid shills who spew your sort of meanness then feel awful about how they are selling their souls to make a buck. As volunteers, we don’t have time to constantly engage in those who are paid to lie online. So your comment here will stay, but if you continue to try and engage us in an ongoing fashion…we don’t have time to keep track of you so will ban you from the site so that our website does not become your platform.
  • commented 2014-10-29 12:16:05 -0700
    Put your time, money, and energy towards climate change. If we can’t grow it we can’t eat! Work on our drinking water problem. Your causing my food cost to increase. Read Monday- 10/27/2014 WSJ Review & Outlook article- A18. We don’t need GMO labeling because nearly everything already has a GMO Free label on it. What kind of a salary do you pull down a year doing this?
  • commented 2014-10-17 06:01:47 -0700
    We here in the UK support your campaign fully to get huge corporations to take responsibility and label GMO ingredients as a consumer right! Please help our campaign along similar lines by signing the following petition to Friends of the Earth.

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/friends_of_the_earth_Force_food_companies_to_label_their_products_GMO_ingredients/edit/
  • commented 2014-10-17 06:01:47 -0700
    We here in the UK support your campaign fully to get huge corporations to take responsibility and label GMO ingredients as a consumer right! Please help our campaign along similar lines by signing the following petition to Friends of the Earth.

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/friends_of_the_earth_Force_food_companies_to_label_their_products_GMO_ingredients/edit/
  • commented 2014-10-15 13:58:32 -0700
    Fairfax, Virginia- I am a college student who is doing a paper on labeling GMOs and was wondering if you had any information on why labeling GMOs is important and recent news on the issue or on passing any bills to get labeling in the US or specifically in California.
  • commented 2014-10-04 11:14:56 -0700
    Hello, I am very concern about GMO. I am manager editor of magazine What When and Where in West Palm Beach, and I would like to take 2 pages free for What are we eating? article. Could you send it in pdf including maps in good resolution to print? Thank you for open eyes to our people! www.whatwhenandwhere.net Gisela Ramirez
  • commented 2014-09-27 11:01:03 -0700
    tHE vILLAGES,fLORIDA 32162
  • commented 2014-09-23 10:50:56 -0700
    You cannot effectively discuss GMOs without discussing the “Green Revolution” and industrial agriculture. I teach people how to maintain and increase soil fertility, so the GMO issue, as well as debates about how to make nutrient rich food available to everyone on the planet, cross my desk many times daily. I was recently asked, “How can we successfully continue to feed the world?”


    Gardens and Micro Farms are Cost Inefficient and Fail to Feed Society

    by Lichen June


    People keep telling me that gardens and micro farms are cost inefficient and fail to feed society. Sometimes this information is delivered loudly and firmly with great emphasis on profit, and great personal attachment to the idea of its being true. There are a lot of myths and misconceptions about how modern chemical agriculture feeds the world. This is to be expected because so few people are even beginning to understand the complexity of the relationships between bacteria, fungi, and plants that create living soil. Less than 1% of the organisms in living soil have been identified and named let alone given any study for us to begin to grasp their roles. This frontier is just opening up in science right now. The reason it wasn’t studied earlier was the myth that NPK: Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium, were all that was needed to grow plants. Modern agriculture is balanced entirely on this myth. You can grow plants that way for a number of years, so long as you can afford the fossil fuels to do it and you don’t mind the lack of nutrients in your food, however, there are two catches.


    The first catch is that the N, P, and K are stabilized in salt and watered into the soil. A normal plant in healthy soil chooses which nutrients it needs from a long, long list and does starch exchanges at the hair root level with the bacteria and fungi who are dealing in that necessary nutrient. Plants have no choice but to drink water. So, when NPK based fertilizers are applied to the big mono crops, the plants are force fed those fertilizers through salt and watering until they become so bloated (more pounds = more money) that they are like beacons for pests, fungus, and weeds.


    Then comes the second catch. The farmers must throw on massive amounts of pesticide, fungicide, and herbicide to try and help their very weak but large crops survive what would have been their natural demise. Think about that for a minute… The companies that are creating and profiting from crops that attract pests, fungus and weeds, are also profiting from the sale of pesticides, fungicides, and herbicides to manage those problems that they exacerbate. All of these poisons kill the living organisms in the soil. Those living organisms were there ready to not only feed current plants, but also to continue doing the exchanges that would create the food for future plants. (Not to mention all that living soil does for us in carbon sequestration.) Nutrients in the soil are finite when the soil is dying/dead. In fact even with nutrient rich soil, if you don’t have the right pH and combination of living organisms to do the exchanges with the plants, those nutrients are as unavailable to the plants as if they were locked away in a safe. So, eventually, the only way to yield a crop is by moving to new ecosystems and fresh living soil somewhere else that hasn’t yet been depleted and killed. Well, that is the only way other than growing your crops in ways that encourage rather than kill that soil life, in ways that help plants grow strong, healthy, and nutrient dense year upon year.


    Fossil fuel issues aside, modern farming can only move over to the next field so long before all the soil is dead. Game over. Big chemical agriculture and GMOs can only continue so long as more and more cash is thrown in and more and more soil is killed. So the problem is not that chemical agriculture is just unsustainable from an eco friendly perspective, it is literally unsustainable, and leaves us with soil unable to grow food without high inputs. It is magical thinking to assume that science even has the time to solve this collapse of billions upon billions of different living relationships in the soil that have barely begun to be studied.


    When Cuba lost access to fossil fuels in the early 1990s people began to starve. In desperation, everyone, everywhere began growing food. They survived precisely because of the emergence of gardens and small farms. This story is detailed in the documentary film, “The Power of Community, How Cuba Survived Peak Oil,” directed by Faith Morgan. The reality is that gardening and small farms which build living soil are the only way humanity will be able to continue to feed themselves and the sooner we switch over, the more likely more people will survive when modern chemical agriculture reaches its end game.


    The idea that third world people need the innovations of modern agriculture in order to eat is also a myth. First, there is more than enough food in the world, made unavailable by markets and profits, not scarcity. For more info on this read, "Hope’s Edge, the Next Diet for a Small Planet,” by Frances Moore Lappe and Anna Lappe. Second, a lot of those starving poor became so as western chemical agriculture and corporate interests colonized and pushed peoples off of their land where they were previously feeding themselves just fine from living soil ecosystems and home gardens. This shift was graphically documented in the book, "Ancient Futures, Lessons from Ladakh for a Globalizing World,” by Helena Norberg-Hodge. Also, it is impossible to ignore the tens of thousands of third world farmers who have committed suicide because of the high costs and subsequent failures of GMO crops and other farming practices based on killing the soil. They often commit suicide by drinking the same poisons that killed their soil and destroyed their families ability to grow a diverse and nutritious diet. On the heels of these sort of tragedies, and deficiencies in access to nutrients, 1st world solutions like Golden Rice are an offensive and blind gesture. If their soil was still alive they could grow crops that were far more nutrient dense and available locally. But then that would cut out the corporate middle man. And point out that “The Green Revolution” of chemical agriculture and depleted soil is actually what is depriving people of nutrients in their food supply. But Westerners keep making themselves feel better offering poor people modified rice. Kind of like offering a crippled person a flimsy cane while continuing to kick them down hill.


    Gardening and micro farming are only inefficient when your priority is profits for the few big agro corporations, rather than many local family farmers making profit off of many separate smaller acreages. Micro farms can make well over $1,000 per acre, while big chemical agriculture makes about $25 per acre. If you start to look at the pounds of food per square foot, and nutrient density in food grown in living soil, industrial agriculture comes up shamefully inefficient. Not only are big agro business and GMO farming inefficient at the amount of nutrient produced per acre, they are also the most inefficient of all at creating the soil life that will guaranty that we can eat next year and the year after that, etc. So, the question is which matters more, deficiency in profits or deficiency in life?


    Lichen June is the Director of the Northwest Permaculture Institute in Oregon, USA


    http://nwpermacultureinstitute.org/
  • commented 2014-09-19 07:51:03 -0700
    Actually “Inna” (if that’s your name)- that may be your opinion about why Prop 37 lost, but both I and pollsters know better. I talked with tons of folks who were really upset once they learned the lies they’d been told. in fact, I’ve not met one real person who was not shocked at their tactics, even if they don’t support labeling. So there you go. If you think the election process with all the dirty advertising is equitable, then do some research on Prop 29 from 2012. Same BS tactics. Whether it’s oil, pharma, tobacco or food issues, they play dirty. If you think they play fair, well….not much I can say about that. I would prefer mutagenesis labeled, too. (BTW..another sign to me that you are a troll as impartial folk don’t know or care about this and would definitely not communicate in this way) This is about labeling.transgenics, cisgenics, dsRNA and RNAi at this point. Weight gain? I assumed since you are so well read that you read the actual study. No? Just read the read the BS PR that they fed you? They count weight gain a measure of health- not organ health, behavior, etc., which is much more indicative of health. Like I said…dig deeper. Or don’t, as I doubt you will. I am even more convinced now you are a troll. No one who is impartial spends this much time commenting in the manner in which you write then checking back. Impartial people don’t have the time to waste or the inclination.
  • commented 2014-09-17 16:28:36 -0700
    Actually, Pamm, the reason you lost on the labeling issue is that voters “got it” that they were being hyped. Don’t think voters are so stupid as to get slammed by “slick” advertising — if that were the case, the energy companies, with many times more $$$ than the biotech companies, would have “convinced” voters through “slick manipulation” that global warming isn’t real. That argument just doesn’t hold. Plain and simple: It lost because the voters saw through it.

    ? I never mentioned weight gain.

    I still would LOVE to have an answer from you guys on why there isn’t more concern (whether “shrieking” or not) about having to label organic food that’s been processed using mutagenesis and radiation (which, btw, have had much less scrutiny and study than genetic engineering). Or does the “right to know” only apply to genetic engineering? If so, why?
  • commented 2014-09-17 14:56:01 -0700
    Actually, Inna, none of the 64 countries that label GE foods include animals that eat GE feed in their laws. If we had been able to label them (which we could not, see next sentence) we would have been accused of being the most restrictive and onerous law on the globe, not in alignment with the rest of the world. FYI- in California as elsewhere, ballot initiatives can only be about one subject. Something that eats GE feed is not the same thing legally as something that is GE. So the law could have been challenged and would have probably lost. Our law was in line with the global standards. All the exemptions were similar to international labeling laws. We cannot touch alcohol labels as they are governed by the fed. We did not lose because of being in alignment with the rest of the world. We lost because the a very slick PR company twisted the truth and in some case lied. http://www.carighttoknow.org/democratic_party_supports_prop_37_beware_of_fake_mailersNo sure who “Jessica” is. The GE sweet corn on the market is mostly frozen or canned. GM corn on the market in corn flake and chips is not sweet corn, it’ maize or field corn so we are eating plenty of it (if you still eat corn). If folks want to know the origin of the sugar beets, they are entitled to it. Yes, we are all aware that GE is a process, thanks. “Why don’t you guys shriek” sounds pretty trollish/shillish to me… or a tad impolite at any rate. We, too, read plenty of science. But I’m sure, as a well readm nonshill type, you may have heard about the study that shows that science in Chemical Land isn’t unbiased. In addition, that study you mention is very questionable…weight gain is not that good of a measure of health. If it was, the US would be considered the healthiest country in the world. FYI: it’ not. No major harm? Dig deeper with a more critical eye.
  • commented 2014-09-17 14:02:28 -0700
    More about sweet corn in the supermarkets: (it’s not GMO, Jessica)

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/26/corn-health-myths-nutrition_n_5591977.html
  • commented 2014-09-17 13:59:36 -0700
    Jessica, there is hardly any GMO sweet corn in the markets. I wonder what you’re eating.

    You DO know, don’t you, that the California initiative to label GMOs would have exempted livestock that’s fed with GE crops, from labeling? Huge loopholes, which is why it was defeated. Additionally, re: your comment about GE sugar beets — yes, most sugar beets are genetically engineered. However, if you read up on it, you will know that the processed sugar (final product) is molecularly identical to non-GE sugar. So the “gmo” label on sugar beets would be false. Additionally, I wonder if you’re aware that genetic engineering is a process; did you know that many organic seeds use a (safe) process called mutagenesis or irradiation? Why don’t you guys shriek for those to be similarly labeled, in your “right to know” ? No, I’m not a shill for Monsanto; just a well-read consumer who puts science before hype and ideology. You will also find it interesting that over 100 billion (that’s with a B) animals of all types have been fed GE crops for many years, with no damage; major study just came out. And no, that study is not a shill for Monsanto either.
Volunteer Events Donate